MUDRA KNIGHT
Book a Consultation
Inference Economics

Stop bleeding on LLM inference costs.

A 24-day diagnostic-led engagement that maps every inference node in your pipeline, applies 17 token-reduction levers across two prongs, and hands over institutional capability — not just a report.

Requires LLM telemetry — Langfuse, Helicone, Braintrust, or LiteLLM proxy logs. No telemetry? 2-day instrument-first setup included.
This page runs zero inference
The Problem

Three patterns we see in every AI-native company bleeding on inference

Agentic Spam Loop

Your agents call each other in endless loops. Agent A generates output that Agent B reviews, which triggers another Agent A call. Every cycle costs tokens. You're paying for the loop, not the output.

Before

3–8 LLM calls per task (avg)

After

1–2 LLM calls per task (with routing)

Savings: 40–70%

Model Sprawl

Every team picked their own model. Every pipeline uses the most expensive model available, even for trivial tasks. There is no routing policy — every request gets the flagship model, regardless of complexity.

Before

Average: flagship model for all tasks

After

Right-sized model per task complexity

Savings: 50–85%

Re-Inference Cost

The same LLM call runs multiple times because nobody cached it. Same system prompt. Same user query. Same output — generated fresh every time. You're paying for the same tokens on repeat.

Before

~30% repeat queries uncached

After

Semantic caching covers ~50% of repeats

Savings: 20–50%

The Levers

17 levers. Two prongs. One architecture.

Click any lever to expand. Each one targets a specific token-reduction opportunity in your pipeline. Prong A exports nodes to zero inference. Prong B reduces tokens on what stays.

ZERO TOKEN — Prong A
INFERENCE-MINIMIZED — Prong B

Routing

Caching

Comparison

Why Mudra Knight vs observability platforms and LLM proxies

CapabilityMudra KnightObservability PlatformsLLM Proxies
Deterministic Export (Zero Token)✅ Systematic T0–T4 classification + export pipeline❌ Not available❌ Not available
Token Reduction (Modeled)✅ 17-lever audit with measured deltas⚠️ Usage tracking only — no optimization✅ Routing + caching (subset of levers)
Compliance Carve-Out✅ 4-class compliance matrix (A–D) per node❌ Not available❌ Not available
Full Pre-Engagement Audit✅ 24-day engagement with 6 phases⚠️ Dashboard monitoring (no engagement model)❌ Self-service configuration only
Cost Reduction w/ Routing✅ Model routing + fallback chain + intent routing❌ Not available✅ Core feature (but no compliance layer)
Institutional Handover✅ Doctrine + runbooks + team training❌ Not available❌ Not available
Air-Gapped Deployment✅ Client bare metal — zero data leaves❌ Cloud-hosted⚠️ Self-hosted option available
The Timeline

24 days from diagnosis to handover

Days 1–3

Phase 1: Diagnosis

Analyze LLM spend from telemetry or raw logs. Identify the top cost drivers. Classify every inference node by prong eligibility.

  • Spend analysis report
  • Top-3 quick wins
  • Prong A/B opportunity sizing
Days 4–7

Phase 2: Full Audit

Run the 17-lever auditor on the target pipeline. Every node gets a lever-by-lever assessment. Compliance carveout applied for regulated nodes.

  • Full audit report (17 levers)
  • Export candidate shortlist
  • Compliance restriction map
Days 8–14

Phase 3: Prong A Sprint

Build and deploy deterministic exports for all eligible T0/T1 nodes. Regex patterns, classical ML substitutes, distillation DB entries.

  • Deterministic exports per node
  • Parity test suite (≥98%)
  • Deployment runbook
Days 15–19

Phase 4: Prong B Optimization

Deploy token-reduction levers on remaining inference nodes: routing, caching, compression, schema caps, batch execution.

  • Optimized routing configuration
  • Caching layer deployed
  • Schema constraints applied
Days 20–22

Phase 5: Parity Validation

Validate that optimized pipeline matches original output quality. Run the full test suite. Verify compliance gates still pass.

  • Parity validation report
  • Regression test results
  • Compliance gate audit
Days 23–24

Phase 6: Handover

Transfer institutional capability. Doctrine document, runbooks, team training, maintenance schedule.

  • Doctrine document
  • Operations runbook
  • Team training
  • Maintenance schedule
Pricing

From diagnosis to enterprise program

TIER 1

Burn Diagnosis

$7.5K

1 week1 FDE Engineer

  • LLM spend analysis (from telemetry or raw logs)
  • Quick-wins report (top 3 token-reduction opportunities)
  • Prong A vs Prong B opportunity sizing
  • Recommendation: proceed to full audit or stop here

Best for: Teams that want a rapid spend assessment before committing. 50% of the fee credits toward a full Audit+Export engagement.

50% credit toward Audit + Export
Book a Consultation
Recommended for most engagements
TIER 2

Audit + Export

$35K–$75K

3 weeksTeam of Two (Delta + Echo)

  • Complete inference audit (17-lever analysis)
  • Prong A export sprint (eligible nodes exported to zero inference)
  • Prong B optimization (routing, caching, compression deployed)
  • Parity validation report (≥98% agreement target)
  • Institutional capability handover (runbooks, training, doctrine)

Best for: Organizations with a single high-impact pipeline ready for token-cost reduction. Most common engagement type.

Book a Consultation
TIER 3

Enterprise Multi-Pipeline Program

$150K–$400K

8–16 weeksTeam of Two + rotating specialists

  • Multi-pipeline audit across the organization
  • Full export program (all eligible T0/T1 nodes)
  • Spend-attribution infrastructure (B13 deployed across teams)
  • Custom routing policies per pipeline
  • Quarterly optimization reviews for 12 months

Best for: Enterprises with multiple AI pipelines requiring coordinated token-cost reduction across the organization.

Book a Consultation
Proof

Pilot results: ~56% token reduction, ~80% cost reduction

56%

Token reduction

80%

Cost reduction (with routing)

15pp

Prong A (Zero Token) contribution

41pp

Prong B contribution

Token reduction (~56%) and cost reduction (~80%) are measured separately and independently. Cost reduction includes model routing effects (cheaper models for simpler tasks), which compound token reduction but are not the same metric. Token reduction is the direct result of deterministic export (Prong A, ~15pp) and inference optimization (Prong B, ~41pp). These figures are from a single pipeline pilot; results vary by pipeline architecture and existing optimization level.

Read the full pilot case study
FAQ

Common questions about inference economics

After Optimization: Governance

Once your tokens are under control, lock it down

Token reduction is the first step. The second is deterministic governance — export eligible nodes to zero inference and wire Circuit Breakers on the rest.

Audit. Optimize. Hand over.

Stop guessing what your inference costs. We'll map every node, apply 17 levers across two prongs, and hand over a pipeline that costs measurably less.

Book a Consultation